QLD Cladding Legislation Changes | SSKB Community Experts

QLD Legislation Changes | Exterior Cladding


Cladding

QLD Government Passes New Cladding Legislation

What exactly is the cladding?

The cladding in question are aluminium composite panels (ACP). These have a polyethylene or plastic core and an aluminium coating. It is a cheaper building material widely used worldwide to clad all types of buildings. These panels are lightweight, easy to install, and provide an attractive metallic finish, which are easy to maintain.

The panels typically range from 4 to 6 mm in thickness, made up of two outer aluminium skins, separated by an inner insulating core. Fire rated panels have a mineral core. Other panels have a polyethylene core and it is this type implicated in the Grenfell Tower disaster.

Why is this type of cladding dangerous?

Polyethylene (PE) is a highly combustible plastic with a melting point from 115-degrees Celsius.

In other words, buildings that have installed Cladding with a PE core essentially have a product as flammable as petrol affixed to the exterior of the building.

How do we know if we have the at-risk cladding?

Testing is the only true way to know what type of ACP cladding has been installed.  Even sourcing the original documents, specifying what ACP cladding was installed, is no guarantee of what grade of material was used.

Builders may in some instances, utilised a substitute combustible product due to cost or availability.  This was not regulated until recently.

In November 2014, the Melbourne Docklands apartment building fire in Victoria drew attention to the serious implications for fire safety of the use of combustible external cladding using ACP made of PE core.

The Metropolitan Fire Brigade (MFB) found that the use of ACP cladding was a contributing factor to the rapid vertical spread of the fire.  The CSIRO conducted tests on the cladding and found it to be combustible. The tests were abandoned after 93 seconds due to the potential for the test equipment to be damaged.   This was due to the intensity of the fire caused by the particular cladding installed in this building.

What about insurance?

Should a building owner (the Body Corporate) become aware that its building is cladded with non-compliant ACP, it is obliged to disclose this heightened risk factor to its insurer in accordance with the Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth). This is because insurers may otherwise decline indemnity for a claim due to non-disclosure.

Any increase in liability is likely to result in an increase in premiums with some buildings reporting a substantial increase in premiums.

SSKB are working with insurers to ensure inspection and testing reports provided by Third Party providers comply with Insurer requirements.

What has happened since June 2017?

In September 2017, the Senate Economic References Committee delivered an interim report on aluminium composite cladding which recommended a total ban on the importation, sale and use of polyethylene-core composite panels as one of its eight recommendations.

The final recommendation on the report was that state and territory governments work together to develop a nationally consistent statutory duty of care protection for end users in the residential strata sector.

In addition, the National Construction Code was also updated and was formally adopted by all Australian States and Territories in March 2018.

One of the amendments was a verification method which in external cladding is deemed compliant when tested under AS5113 and combined with measures such as cavity barriers and sprinklers on balconies.

In mid-2018, the Australian Cladding & Building Standards Summit was held in Melbourne featuring updates from state taskforces, all levels of government, leading industry bodies, insurance sector representatives, key experts, owner interest groups and emergency services.

Queensland Fire and Emergency Services (QFES) has advised that the Queensland Government will be issuing an online assessment regarding cladding to Building Owners.

The Government will use this information to identify what buildings are high, medium and low risk.

In addition, the Queensland Parliament passed a suite of reforms that establishes a chain of responsibility, placing duties on building supply chain participants (including designers, manufacturers, importers, suppliers and installers) to ensure building products used in Queensland are safe and fit for intended purpose.



Related post

Cladding deadline Extended
Cladding Deadlines Extended
Client Solutions
Client Solutions
Everything You Need to Know About Voting
Everything you need to know about voting

Recent Comments

6 Comments

Peter Binnie On September 1, 2018 | Reply

H20 complex varsity lakes I own a unit there is it compliant with cladding legislation regards peter binnie

    Emma Smith On September 3, 2018 | Reply

    Hi Peter, we are waiting for further instructions from the Government regarding the process and ensuring all our clients are compliant. There will be further updates on this matter when more information comes to hand about the online QBCC Survey but feel free to contact your community manager directly should you have any further questions.

Ms Traci-lee Robinson On January 31, 2019 | Reply

Hi I live in a unit at Waterford West was built in 1980 and I have almost a fibro kind of wood with a foam kind of insert and it is swollen and protruding from the building I wonder if this would possibly be cladding or being a SFP would this be under the body Corp insurance please help “Midway Mews” in Waterford West in QLD 4133

lindsay ludwig On March 29, 2019 | Reply

I own one of 12 units in a commercial complex. The building is a concrete tilt panel single level building . Some of the unite owners have constructed a mezzanine floor inside their unit for office ,storage space. Out side above the entry glass doors some owners have installed signage on composite panel. Does our body corp need to get stage 2 inspection carried out by a Building Certifier.

    Emma Smith On March 29, 2019 | Reply

    Hi Lindsay,
    When completing part one of the checklist, you would have been advised whether you are required to move on to part two or not. Some responses on the Cladding Checklist that are not ACP or EPS such as Plywood or high-pressure laminates (HPL) and Materials other than those listed above have seen these buildings not exit the process at the end of Part 1. . As the “owners” of this process, only the QBCC can determine how it is implemented and applied to individual circumstances. Our facilities management subsidiary have brought this issue to the attention of the QBCC. Consequently, we are unable to provide advice that buildings with no ACP or EPS will not have to progress to Part 2 and beyond. Further updates will be provided as they come to hand.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.